Trenton Maine Drug Bust, Articles C

6. "The National Popular Vote Plan." Evidence as to how a nationwide presidential campaign would be run can be found by examining the way presidential candidates currently campaign inside battleground states. That means some voters, like Republicans in California or Democrats in Mississippi, are voting without power and without attention from their preferred candidates each year. Right now, the President of the United States is not elected by a popular vote. 6. It was a great idea in 1787 but the country has changed since 1787 and the people today want to elect the president by a simple, direct popular vote where whoever gets the most votes wins like we do in every other election in the country. Although faithless electors have not affected the results or outcome of an election yet, in 2016, there were 7 faithless electors. Here are the Cons of the Electoral College 1. 4. Do you have information you want to share with HuffPost? On April 15, 2014 Governor Andrew Cuomo of New York State quietly signed into law the National Popular Vote, making New York the 10th state -- along with the District of Columbia -- to support this effort, while also boosting the total numbers to 165 of the 270 electoral votes needed to make a true national popular vote a reality. That effectively means that votes in the the 75% of the country that are in swing states effectively dont count at all. It understands that while the nation is one union, it is also an amalgam of varying experiences and perspectives arrived at via the settings and unique problems surrounding those who live in different places, and that these differences fall within the broad rubric of federalism. As the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement steps up its effort to impose a direct election for president, attempting to enlist states with a sufficient number of electors to constitute a majority (268) and to bind them to the winner of the national popular vote, those states considering the proposal might first reflect on the nightmare aftermath of the 2000 presidential election. The plan would not get rid of the Electoral College. Donald Trump won the presidential election by securing 304 electoral votes, compared to Hillary Clintons 227 electoral votes. Some critics argue that more people would vote in a direct popular election, according to the University of the Pacific. The first advantage allows for electoral votes to be fairer than the Electoral College (Richards). There would be a reduced need to build coalitions. Is the National Popular Vote Plan Constitutional? By adding this new interstate compact to the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system to elect our president we are in fact making this system even more complicated and even harder for the voters to understand. That nightmare may seem like a pleasant dream if NPV has its way.